Introduction
After reading what Doug Eyman had to say on the topic of HCI in Digital Rhetoric: Theory, Method, Practice, Reflecting on digital rhetoric, code, and interfaces, I realized their intricate interconnectedness. These seemingly distinct concepts share a common goal and underlying mechanics. Before delving into this, the term HIC was unfamiliar to me. It stands for Human-Computer Interaction, a field that can be best described as the science of designing how people interact with computers. Having code and interface are two different puzzle pieces working together. To have the functions to make systems more accessible and conducting smoothly the way the engineers want.
HCI
One of the definitions of HCI is “the study of people, computer technology, and the ways these influence each other.” This aligns with the principles of digital rhetoric. HCI unfolds on a screen or device, where a person controls the code of the operation, with room for persuasion. While HCI is primarily about performance, it can still employ persuasive methods. For instance, the design choice of a toolbar on a website is crucial. Only three tools could fit for it to look good, so I had to decide which three tools were essential, even if there were more I desired.
Connecting
Interfaces play a significant role in this digital realm. They bridge the gap between human rhetoric and digital systems. These interfaces must actively engage users, providing a sense of reward, while the underlying code and design remain invisible. These systems must be robust and interconnected, emphasizing the paramount importance of safety in our digital creations.
Leave a Reply