A sponge yelling and crying out to the air.

Structured

Posted

in

by

leeelij


In pages 12–22 of Old Media, New Media, and Knowledge, J. D. Applen explores the shift from traditional print-based media to digital media and its profound impact on knowledge creation and dissemination. He begins by contrasting old and new media, noting how traditional print media was structured, authoritative, and static. In contrast, digital media introduces a more dynamic, interactive, and decentralized approach to communication. This transformation alters not only how information is presented but also how it is consumed and understood.

One of the key changes Applen discusses is the shift in knowledge production. In the print era, information was carefully curated, often passing through multiple levels of editorial oversight before publication. This process reinforced a sense of authority and reliability. The shift to digital media also raises questions about authority and credibility. In the past, knowledge was often validated through institutional gatekeepers such as publishers, editors, and scholars. However, online platforms have disrupted this structure, allowing virtually anyone to publish information. This democratization of knowledge can be empowering, but it also introduces concerns about misinformation and the need for critical literacy skills. Readers must now actively evaluate sources, question biases, and verify facts rather than rely on traditional gatekeepers.

Applen concludes this section by discussing the broader implications of digital media on communication and learning. The interactive nature of new media encourages collaboration and discussion, fostering a participatory culture where individuals contribute to knowledge rather than passively consume it. However, this shift also demands new skills, requiring individuals to navigate an overwhelming amount of information, discern credible sources, and adapt to evolving digital landscapes. Ultimately, he suggests that while digital media presents new opportunities for engagement and learning, it also challenges conventional ways of thinking about knowledge, authority, and communication.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *