Woman looking over documents with an old school computer to the side

That “New, New” Media

Posted

in

by

nastaroa


Eyman tends to challenge my thinking when it comes to all things digital. The section on “new media” is no different. At first, the term seems easy to define; something along the lines of digital content. But the text keeps complicating that assumption. The question of when media actually stops being “new” stood out to me. There isn’t a clear answer. It made me realize how dependent the definition is on context and time. The idea that these definitions are “contingent” and constantly shifting makes new media feel less like a fixed category and more like something that evolves alongside technology and culture.

The concept of remediation also adds another layer to this. The claim that “no medium… does its cultural work in isolation” shifted how I view digital media. It isn’t so much of seeing it as something entirely separate. It feels more accurate to think of it as building on older forms. Social media, websites, and other digital spaces still carry elements of print and even oral communication. They’re just reworked into new formats. That overlap makes new media feel less like it’s replacing something. Instead, it’s acting as a continuation. 

A Little Variety

Manovich’s principles help ground some of these ideas, especially variability. The idea that new media can exist in “potentially infinite versions” shows how content online never really feels final. It’s always being edited or updated or revised. At the same time, his focus on structure and computation feels a bit limited. Especially when compared to Wysocki’s perspective. Her emphasis on the composer and design brings attention back to the human side of things. That reminds us that these texts are shaped intentionally; they aren’t just generated through systems.

Overall, the reading seems less about defining new media in a strict sense. I think it focuses more on showing why that definition is so difficult to pin down. It’s shaped by both technological structures and human choices. That makes it more complex, but also more interesting to think about. 


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *