What is “Convenience”
Convenience has become the measure of modern life. We crave convenience in how we shop, travel, and—most of all—how we communicate. But when communication itself becomes too convenient, something in our connections begins to change. J. David Bolter calls our current moment the “late age of print,” a period when we rely on digital tools that make writing effortless and immediate. Yet the ease of typing, sending, and deleting messages has quietly restructured not only how we express ourselves but how we understand each other.
Digital communication offers undeniable advantages: messages reach anyone, anywhere, almost instantly. Email remediated the handwritten letter, keeping the written exchange but stripping away the waiting, the paper, and the physical touch of ink. This speed creates the illusion of closeness—we can talk at any time—but it also invites a kind of emotional shortcut. A thoughtful paragraph becomes a quick emoji, and tone is often lost in the rush to respond.
In earlier print cultures, writing was slower and more deliberate. A letter’s imperfections—the slant of handwriting, the time taken to compose each line—carried traces of the writer’s presence. Digital writing, by contrast, feels weightless and endlessly editable. We gain flexibility but lose a sense of permanence and depth.
Cultural shifts in communication reveal a deeper truth: our tools reshape our thinking. As Bolter and Ong suggest, writing technologies do not simply record our thoughts—they form them. If we want to preserve meaningful connection, we might need to reclaim slowness in our communication. True connection may depend not on how quickly we write, but on how consciously we choose our words.
Leave a Reply